审阅范围 · Review scope
公开来源文字与原创综合已审阅。请保留正文中的出处与限制；不代表全库最终验收、实际演奏或学习效果验证。
Public-source text and original synthesis reviewed. Keep the evidence and limitations stated in the text in view. This is not final corpus acceptance or validation of performance or learning outcomes.
公開資料第十七批：工具、價值與創作判斷
Public batch 17: tools, values, and creative judgment
六篇公開文章的文字審閱；另設中英雙語紙上反思任務，部分附可選的原聲鋼琴材料。
Text review of six public articles, plus original bilingual paper reflection tasks; some include optional acoustic-piano material.
完成：6/6 篇完整公開正文；影音、圖片、軟體與來源工程審查：0。
Completed: 6/6 complete public bodies; audio/video, image, software, and source-project reviews: 0.
閱讀與整合規則 / Reading and integration rules
1.
原始中文題名、指定網址及來源 ID 完整保留；英文題名為編輯翻譯。日期另存 ISO 與頁面文字。JSON 與 Markdown 是同一成果的兩種表示。
Original Chinese titles, assigned URLs, and source IDs are retained exactly; English titles are editorial translations. Dates are stored in ISO and displayed form. JSON and Markdown represent the same work.
2.
閱讀規則：把個人觀點、假想案例、已知資料與實證分開。文章不是科學研究、現今產品測試、普遍道德規則或對使用者的職涯建議。
Reading rule: separate personal views, hypothetical cases, supplied facts, and empirical evidence. An article is not scientific research, current product testing, a universal moral code, or career advice to the user.
3.
僅審公開正文文字；課程連結不等於課程審閱。音訊、影片、圖片、譜圖、軟體、來源工程與連結文章均未檢查。
Only public body text was reviewed; course links do not constitute course review. Audio, video, images, score images, software, source projects, and linked articles were not inspected.
4.
來源衍生文字含雙語題名、摘要、用途、證據類型、涵蓋與限制；保守按每個中日韓字符加英數詞元計算，單篇不超過 200。原創任務獨立標示，不複製來源練習、旋律、歌詞或原文。
Source-derived text includes bilingual titles, summaries, roles, evidence type, coverage, and caveats, conservatively counting each CJK character plus Latin/alphanumeric token, at most 200 per source. Original tasks are separately marked; no source exercises, melodies, lyrics, or article bodies are copied.
5.
全部任務可用紙筆完成；不需唱歌、麥克風、錄音、軟體、帳戶或購物。沒有安裝、上傳來源、購買、登入或推送。
Every task can be completed on paper without singing, a microphone, recording, software, an account, or purchases. Nothing was installed, source-uploaded, purchased, logged into, or pushed.
6.
題目與答案均已公開；先寫預測再核對，不稱為未見測驗、已證實學習遷移或成效。沒有使用者表現資料。
Tasks and answers are disclosed; predict before checking, without calling them unseen tests, demonstrated learning transfer, or efficacy evidence. No user-performance data were collected.
原創共用流程 / Original shared workflow
1.
先選一張卡，分欄寫「題給事實」「我的判斷」「所需證據」「不能推出的結論」。允許回答資料不足，不必迎合作者偏好。
Choose one card and separate supplied facts, your judgment, needed evidence, and conclusions that do not follow. “Insufficient information” is allowed; matching the author’s preference is not required.
2.
試彈完全自選。先找鍵，再用舒適速度與音量；可分手、停頓，不訂速度或重複次數。不適即停；沒有試彈時，只報告紙上核對。
Playing is entirely optional. Locate keys first, then use a comfortable pace and volume; separate hands and pauses are allowed, with no speed or repetition targets. Stop if uncomfortable; without playing, report only paper checks.
3.
每張卡的假想事實只在該題有效，不拿來判斷真實人物、產品、音樂類型或工作市場。完成是交出理由與界線，不是宣稱進步。
Each card’s fictional facts apply only within that task, not to real people, products, genres, or labor markets. Completion means providing reasons and boundaries, not claiming improvement.
跨批預算 / Cross-batch budget
以來源 ID 與去除尾斜線的網址查既有 public-batch JSON，未見六篇的先前正文審閱；不把索引、指派清單或鏡像表示當成額外閱讀。
Searching prior public-batch JSON by source ID and URL without a trailing slash found no earlier body reviews of these six sources. Indexes, assignments, and mirrored representations are not additional readings.
1. 換工具的藝術
The art of changing tools
WEB-50277a1b7801 · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2025-09-13（2025 年 9 月 13 日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://wiwi.blog/blog/changing-tools/
正文定位 / Body locator: 961–996
擷取總行數 / Total extraction lines: 1025.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
作者自述不同輸入工具改變創作取向；無期限時享受陌生工具的慢，趕工則用熟悉工具。
The author reports different creative habits with different input tools, enjoying unfamiliar slowness without deadlines but using familiar tools when rushed.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
比較表示方式。
Compare representations.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
個人經驗，非創意成效證據；軟體未測。
Personal experience, not creativity-outcome evidence; software untested.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
同一串事件，兩種紙上表示
One event sequence, two paper views
目標 / Objective
核對表示法與內容是否分開改變；不把紙張排法當成軟體測試。
Check whether representation and content change separately, without treating paper layout as a software test.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
紙筆即可。若試彈：4/4，兩小節共八拍；C4 是中央 C。右手單音，左手全休，無踏板；速度自選。橫列的「—」延續前一音，不再起音。
Paper is sufficient. If playing: 4/4, two bars totaling eight beats; C4 is middle C. Right-hand single notes, left hand resting throughout, no pedal; choose a comfortable pace. A horizontal “—” continues the preceding note without another attack.
橫列 / Horizontal view
| 小節 / Bar | 逐拍內容 / Beat contents |
|---|---|
| 1 | G4 · A4 · F4 · — |
| 2 | E4 · G4 · F4 · — |
直列 / Vertical view
| 事件 / Event | 小節 / Bar | 拍位 / Beat | 音高 / Pitch | 持續拍數 / Duration in beats |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | G4 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | A4 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 | 3 | F4 | 2 |
| 4 | 2 | 1 | E4 | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | G4 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 | F4 | 2 |
修改契約 / Edit contract
只把第六個事件的音高 F4 改成 E4；開始拍位與持續不變。兩種表示都要另留修改版，不擦掉原版。
Change only event 6 from F4 to E4; preserve its start and duration. Keep a separate revised version of each view rather than erasing either original.
步驟 / Steps
1.
先不看答案，數每版的起音次數與總拍數；在橫列中圈出第三與第六個事件的延續格。
Before the answer key, count attacks and total beats in each view; circle the continuation cells for events 3 and 6 in the horizontal view.
2.
完成指定修改，寫出兩種表示中的同一座標。記哪一種較容易找到音高、哪一種較容易看持續；也可寫沒有差別。
Make the specified edit and identify the corresponding location in both views. Note which made pitch or duration easier to find; “no difference” is allowed.
3.
可選擇只試彈原版與修改版，不必彈兩次相同的表示。分開記「紙上內容相同」與「這次彈奏感受」。
Optionally play only the original and revised sequence, rather than repeating identical representations. Keep “same written content” separate from impressions of this playing attempt.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
兩種原版皆六次起音、八拍；延續格在每小節第四拍。換排法本身沒有換音高、節奏或手部分工。
Both originals contain six attacks and eight beats; continuation cells occur on beat 4 of each bar. Rearranging the display alone changes neither pitches, rhythm, nor hand assignment.
2.
修改位置是第二小節第三拍，持兩拍；修改後仍六次起音、八拍。哪種紙上表示較順手是本次自述，不證明某軟體比較好。
The edit is bar 2 beat 3, lasting two beats; the revision still has six attacks and eight beats. Preferred paper presentation is a report about this task, not proof of superior software.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
若目標是改變音樂內容，只換紙張方向不夠；若目標是找出事件座標，兩版都足夠。沒有時間資料便不宣稱哪版更快。
For changing musical content, page orientation alone is insufficient; for locating event coordinates, both views suffice. Without timing data, claim no speed advantage.
限制 / Limits
沒有比較任何真實工具、創造力或長期學習；六個事件只是完整給定的小例子。
No real tool, creativity, or long-term learning was compared; the six events are merely a fully supplied small example.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出兩種修改版、正確拍數與事件數，並寫一項可判斷事項與一項未知。
Submit both revised views, correct beat and event counts, one decidable point, and one unknown.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
129/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 129.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.
2. 作弊
Cheating
WEB-eb1fea3938ca · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2025-05-09（2025年5月9日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://www.wiwi.blog/blog/cheating/
正文定位 / Body locator: 主要頁搜尋擷取：標題至結尾信心提醒。
Primary-page search extraction: title through the closing confidence reminder.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
作者以演出剪輯與預先寫好的獨奏，討論圈內標準和聽眾期待不同。
The author uses edited performances and precomposed solos to discuss differing community standards and audience expectations.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
練習如實標示。
Practice truthful labeling.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
不是爵士共識或欺瞞許可；文中影片未看。
Not jazz consensus or permission to deceive; the discussed video was not watched.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
主張必須符合紀錄
Claims must fit the record
目標 / Objective
只按題給的製作紀錄判斷標籤，不用技巧高低或喜好猜真偽。
Judge labels solely against supplied production records, not guessed truth based on skill or taste.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
三張卡都是完全虛構的文字情境，沒有實際影音，不需演奏。題目規則：公開標籤不得與題給紀錄矛盾；未有資料就標未知。
All three cards are entirely fictional text scenarios, with no actual media or playing required. Task rule: public labels must not contradict supplied records; missing information is marked unknown.
情境紀錄 / Scenario records
1.
編號 / ID
A
題給事實 / Supplied facts
演奏前已把樂句全部寫好並練習；當天連續彈完一次，紀錄明示沒有剪接。
The entire phrase was written and practiced beforehand; one continuous take was played that day, with the record explicitly stating no edits.
待審標籤 / Proposed label
當場即興，單次未剪接。
Spontaneously improvised, single unedited take.
2.
編號 / ID
B
題給事實 / Supplied facts
取兩次演奏的片段接成一段；未記錄樂句是否事前寫好。
Segments from two takes were joined into one recording; whether the phrase was composed beforehand is not recorded.
待審標籤 / Proposed label
單次未剪接演奏。
Single unedited performance.
3.
編號 / ID
C
題給事實 / Supplied facts
只存在紙上的音符與節奏方案，尚未演奏或錄音。
Only a paper plan of pitches and rhythms exists; it has not been performed or recorded.
待審標籤 / Proposed label
已完成的現場演奏錄音。
Completed recording of a live performance.
空白欄位 / Blank columns
紀錄支持什麼｜紀錄反駁什麼｜還不知道什麼｜更準確的標籤
What the record supports | what it contradicts | what remains unknown | a more accurate label
步驟 / Steps
1.
先遮住答案，逐張拆開複合主張；同一句中的某部分成立，不代表整句都成立。
Cover the answer key and split each compound claim; one supported part does not make the whole statement supported.
2.
每張各改寫一個標籤，保留有根據的資訊，不替未知過程補故事。
Rewrite one label for each card, retaining supported information without inventing missing process details.
3.
另寫一句判斷界線：若一項活動明訂單次未剪接，哪張紀錄符合該條件？不要從這個答案推出作品好壞。
Write a decision boundary: if an activity explicitly requires one unedited take, which record meets that condition? Do not infer artistic quality from that answer.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
A：可標「預先準備樂句的單次未剪接演奏」；「即興」與紀錄矛盾。符合本題單次未剪接條件，但不符合另加的即興條件。
A: “Single unedited take of a prepared phrase” fits; “improvised” contradicts the record. It meets this task’s single-take condition, but not an additional improvisation condition.
2.
B：可標「由兩次演奏剪接的錄音」；是否即興仍未知。C：可標「尚未演奏的紙上方案」；沒有錄音可供判讀。
B: “Recording edited from two takes” fits; improvisation remains unknown. C: “Unperformed paper plan” fits; no recording exists to assess.
3.
本題沒有提供聲音品質、難度或演奏者完整能力資料；不能排名，也不判定任何真實人物。
The task supplies no sound-quality, difficulty, or broader player-ability data; it supports neither ranking nor judgments about any real person.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
公開要求若改變，合格條件也要重讀。已揭露的剪接可以符合某活動規則，但不能因此稱未剪接；沒有「所有情境皆可」的結論。
If published requirements change, reread eligibility conditions. Disclosed edits may satisfy a particular activity’s rules, but cannot be called unedited; no conclusion applies to every context.
限制 / Limits
這是文字紀錄一致性題，不是鑑定影片真假的工具或對任何樂種的定義。
This is a textual consistency task, not a video-authenticity tool or a definition of any genre.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出三個準確標籤、A 的條件差異與至少一項未知，不以喜好替代證據。
Provide three accurate labels, the differing conditions for A, and at least one unknown, without substituting taste for evidence.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
139/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 139.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.
3. 理念不同，風景不同
Different philosophies, different landscapes
WEB-b4af8adb5835 · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2026-01-27（2026 年 1 月 27 日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://wiwi.blog/blog/different-vision-different-world/
正文定位 / Body locator: 54–99
擷取總行數 / Total extraction lines: 130.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
作者認為相同的推廣目標可由不同理念實現，卻形成不同文化；偏愛自主與深入解說。
The author argues that shared promotional goals can produce different cultures through different values, favoring autonomy and detailed explanation.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
檢查目標與評量。
Check goals against measures.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
個人價值排序，不證明娛樂或競速無益。
A personal value ranking, not proof that entertainment or speed challenges lack value.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
先定判準，再選學習卡
Set criteria before selecting a study card
目標 / Objective
在題給條件下選擇活動，並分清「符合目標」與「已證實有成效」。
Select an activity under supplied conditions, distinguishing goal alignment from demonstrated efficacy.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
紙上比較即可，不需彈琴、實施排名或測時間。以下都是新設計的假想活動，不影射任何課程或創作者。
Compare on paper without playing, running rankings, or timing. These newly designed fictional activities do not represent any course or creator.
卡片 / Cards
1.
編號 / ID
P
說明 / Description
保留一項修改的前後版本；寫一句修改理由；不計速度、不排名。
Retain before/after versions of one change and write one reason; no speed measurement or rankings.
2.
編號 / ID
Q
說明 / Description
記一分鐘內完成的格數；和自願參加的同伴比較格數；不要求解釋修改。
Record cells completed in one minute and compare counts with consenting peers; no explanation of changes is required.
任務要求 / Briefs
1.
編號 / ID
L
條件 / Requirements
目標：交出一項修改的理由；限制：不要與別人排名。
Goal: provide a reason for one change. Constraint: no ranking against others.
2.
編號 / ID
M
條件 / Requirements
目標：在自願的同伴活動中比較完成格數；這次不要求修改理由。
Goal: compare completed-cell counts in a voluntary peer activity; a revision rationale is not required this time.
工作表 / Worksheet
目標｜必要限制｜活動給了什麼證據｜缺了什麼｜保留／改寫／不選
Goal | required constraint | evidence produced by activity | missing evidence | keep/rewrite/reject
步驟 / Steps
1.
先為 L、M 各選一張卡，逐項對照要求，不把自己的喜好當成題目條件。
Choose one card for L and one for M, checking each requirement without replacing it with your own preference.
2.
把 Q 改成符合 L 的新卡，寫明刪掉什麼、加上什麼；不得只換活動名稱。
Rewrite Q to meet L, specifying what is removed and added; merely renaming the activity is insufficient.
3.
寫下一項「不能由活動完成數直接推出」的結論，並指出要另外取得哪類資料。
State one conclusion that activity-completion counts alone do not support, and identify the additional type of evidence needed.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
L 選 P；Q 缺修改理由，且有 L 不要的同伴比較。M 可選 Q；P 不產生 M 指定的比較格數。這些是條件配對，不是人格或藝術高低排名。
L selects P: Q lacks revision reasons and includes unwanted peer comparison. M can select Q: P does not produce the specified comparative counts. These are requirement matches, not rankings of people or art.
2.
一種合格改寫：Q 刪除限時與同伴排名，加入修改前後兩格及一句理由。其他改法只要逐項符合 L 也可。
One valid rewrite removes the timer and peer ranking, adding before/after cells and one reason. Other rewrites are valid if they meet every L requirement.
3.
完成格數不直接證明概念理解；可另外看學習者對一個理由的說明。但本題沒有收集任何人的說明或成效資料。
Cell-completion counts do not directly establish conceptual understanding; a learner’s explanation of a reason could be examined separately. This task collected neither explanations from actual users nor outcome data.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
如果限制改成不許限時，Q 就算自願也不符合；如果目標改成純粹消遣，需重訂判準，不沿用 L 的答案。
If the constraint becomes no timed work, Q fails even with consent; if the goal changes to recreation, redefine the criteria rather than reusing L’s answer.
限制 / Limits
沒有實施活動，也不保證這兩張卡能教會任何音樂技巧。不得把不合本題目標說成普遍無價值。
Neither activity was run, and neither is guaranteed to teach a musical skill. Misalignment with this task’s goal does not imply universal worthlessness.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出兩項選擇、一張符合 L 的改寫卡，以及一項明確的證據界線。
Submit two choices, one rewritten card meeting L, and an explicit evidence boundary.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
136/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 136.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.
4. 跳出盒子做音樂
Making music outside the box
WEB-c5f1394e9bce · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2025-08-22（2025 年 8 月 22 日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://wiwi.blog/blog/jump-out-of-the-box/
正文定位 / Body locator: 961–1007
擷取總行數 / Total extraction lines: 1038.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
作者偏好獨立硬體、開放聲音格式與即時演奏，以減少專有軟體依賴。
The author favors standalone hardware, open audio formats, and live playing to reduce proprietary-software dependence.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
盤點保存依賴。
Audit preservation dependencies.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
非硬體必優；相容性、比例與音質承諾未驗證。
Not hardware superiority; compatibility, proportions, and sound-quality promises are unverified.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
保存了什麼，還缺什麼？
What is preserved, and what is missing?
目標 / Objective
在明示的假想故障條件下，比較能重建的資料，不推測真實軟體能力。
Compare recoverable information under an explicit fictional failure condition, without guessing real software capabilities.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
只做紙上推演，不開啟或刪除任何檔案。目標是在電腦不能用時仍能讀出音高、開始拍位、持續及手部分工；不要求重建聲音。
Use a paper simulation only; open or delete no files. The goal is to read pitch, onset beat, duration, and hand assignment when the computer is unavailable; recreating sound is not required.
完整音符卡 / Complete note card
4/4，一小節，C4＝中央 C。右手：第一拍 E4 一拍、第二拍 G4 一拍、第三拍 A4 兩拍；左手：第一拍 C3 持四拍。兩手第一拍同時開始；無踏板，速度與音量自選。
4/4, one bar, C4 = middle C. Right hand: E4 on beat 1 for one beat, G4 on beat 2 for one beat, A4 on beat 3 for two beats. Left hand: C3 on beat 1 for four beats. Both hands start together; no pedal, with comfortable pace and volume.
假想選項 / Fictional options
1.
編號 / ID
R
說明 / Description
只留在無法開機的電腦上；沒有其他可讀副本。
Stored only on the computer that will not start; no other readable copy exists.
2.
編號 / ID
S
說明 / Description
紙卡完整抄下上述音符卡及日期；可直接閱讀。
A paper card copies the complete note card above and a date; it can be read directly.
3.
編號 / ID
T
說明 / Description
紙上只寫「E、G、A；左手 C」；沒有八度、拍位或時值。
Paper says only “E, G, A; left hand C,” omitting octaves, onsets, and durations.
範圍 / Scope
所有故障與副本條件皆為題給假設，不是某產品的實測結果。
All failure and copy conditions are stipulated assumptions, not tests of any product.
步驟 / Steps
1.
先按四項目標逐欄判斷 R、S、T 是否提供可讀資料；缺資料時寫缺哪一項，不自己補音。
Check R, S, and T against the four goals; specify missing information rather than inventing notes.
2.
把 T 補成完整的紙卡，只用題目提供的內容；另外加一欄標示未保存的項目。
Complete T using only the supplied content, then add a column identifying what has not been preserved.
3.
可選試彈完整卡；若只分手，照實記錄。即使成功讀出或彈出，也不宣稱還原了某次原始演奏。
Optionally play the complete card and record separate-hand work honestly. Successful reading or playing does not establish recovery of any original performance.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
S 符合本題可讀的四項資料要求；R 在指定故障下讀不到；T 只有部分音名和手別，不能唯一決定音高與時間。
S meets all four readable-information requirements. R is inaccessible under the specified failure. T supplies only some pitch names and hand labels, insufficient to determine pitches and timing uniquely.
2.
完整卡右手三次起音，共四拍；左手一次起音，持四拍。沒有保存某次實際演奏的音色、細微時間或力度變化。
The complete card has three right-hand attacks totaling four beats, and one left-hand attack lasting four beats. It preserves no actual performance’s timbre, fine timing, or dynamic variation.
3.
紙卡符合這次有限的目標，不代表任何資料都能用紙完整替代；若目標是原音重現，本題三個選項都沒有提供足夠證據。
The paper card meets this limited goal, not every possible preservation need. If the goal becomes original-sound reproduction, none of the three options supplies sufficient evidence.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
目標是讀取給定事件時可選 S；目標變成精確聲音或可編輯工程時，先列出缺項，不能沿用同一結論。
Choose S for reading the stipulated events; if the goal changes to exact sound or an editable project, list missing requirements rather than carrying over the same conclusion.
限制 / Limits
沒有測試匯出、匯入、相容性、故障率或長期保存，也不推薦購買硬體。
No export, import, compatibility, failure-rate, or long-term preservation test was performed, and no hardware purchase is recommended.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出依賴表、補全的 T，以及音符資料與演奏聲音不可混同的一句說明。
Submit the dependency table, completed T, and one sentence separating note data from performed sound.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
124/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 124.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.
5. 我該做音樂工作嗎？
Should I work in music?
WEB-a608fcb71530 · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2024-11-01（2024年11月1日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://wiwi.blog/blog/music-career/
正文定位 / Body locator: 385–438
擷取總行數 / Total extraction lines: 461.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
回覆一位讀者時，作者區分喜愛音樂與音樂工作的雜務，談生計、知名度及技能組合。
Replying to one reader, the author distinguishes enjoying music from music-work administration, discussing livelihood, visibility, and combinations of skills.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
檢查決策缺項。
Check decision gaps.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
個別回信觀點；非市場證據或你的職涯建議。
Views in an individual reply, not labor-market evidence or career advice to you.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
算得出的事，與不能替你決定的事
What can be counted, and what cannot decide for you
目標 / Objective
使用虛構時間格練習辨識資料範圍；不選職業、不預測收入。
Use fictional time blocks to identify the scope of evidence, without choosing a career or predicting income.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
兩張卡是完全虛構的一次活動安排，不是工作調查、典型職業或個人的真實日程。每格二十分鐘，只比較已列出的格子；未列時間全部未知。
The two cards are entirely fictional one-session plans, not a job survey, typical occupations, or anyone’s real schedule. Each block lasts twenty minutes; compare only listed blocks, with all unlisted time unknown.
卡片 / Cards
1.
編號 / ID
U
時間格 / Blocks
創作、創作、創作、創作。
Create, create, create, create.
2.
編號 / ID
V
時間格 / Blocks
創作、創作、回覆訊息、回覆訊息、準備說明、準備說明。
Create, create, reply to messages, reply to messages, prepare explanations, prepare explanations.
題給目標 / Stipulated goal
只問：哪張卡在所列時間內至少有兩格創作？另記創作格數與所列總時間。
Ask only: which card contains at least two creation blocks in its listed time? Also record creation-block count and listed total time.
未知項 / Unknowns
收入、費用、壓力、喜好、成果品質、未列時間與長期可行性都未提供。
Income, costs, stress, preferences, outcome quality, unlisted time, and long-term feasibility are not supplied.
步驟 / Steps
1.
先不看答案，分別算兩張卡的總分鐘與創作分鐘；只對照題給的至少兩格條件。
Before the key, calculate total and creation minutes for each card, checking only the stipulated minimum of two creation blocks.
2.
判斷三個主張：「U 創作分鐘較多」「V 收入較高」「U 更適合你」；逐項寫有支持／未知及理由。
Judge three claims: “U has more creation minutes,” “V pays more,” and “U suits you better.” Mark supported/unknown with a reason for each.
3.
寫一個日後若要了解真實選項所需詢問的問題，不必蒐集資料，也不把答案猜好。
Write one question needed to understand a real option later; neither collect data now nor guess its answer.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
U：共八十分鐘，四格創作也是八十分鐘。V：共一百二十分鐘，兩格創作共四十分鐘。兩者都符合至少兩格的題給條件。
U: eighty total minutes, with four creation blocks also totaling eighty minutes. V: one hundred twenty total minutes, including two creation blocks totaling forty minutes. Both meet the stipulated two-block minimum.
2.
「U 創作分鐘較多」有題給資料支持；收入與個人適合度都未知。不能因為 U 的比例高，就推論任何真實工作比較好。
“U has more creation minutes” is supported by supplied data; income and personal fit are unknown. U’s larger proportion does not establish superiority of any real job.
3.
可問：「這個真實選項每週有哪些必做工作、各花多久？」這只是資訊缺項問題，不含應該選哪一條路的答案。
A possible question is: “What required tasks does this real option involve each week, and how long does each take?” This identifies missing information without selecting a path.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
在本題只作計數結論；若要推到真實生涯，現有資料不足，必須另有個人條件、可靠現況與完整選項。這份教材不替使用者作決定。
Conclude only about counts here. Applying the result to a real career lacks sufficient information and would require personal circumstances, reliable current facts, and complete options. This material makes no decision for the user.
限制 / Limits
不把假想時間當成收入預測，也不暗示需要把興趣變工作。
Fictional times are not an income forecast, and no need to turn a hobby into work is implied.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出正確分鐘數、三個主張的證據狀態與一個資訊問題；不附職業推薦。
Provide correct minute counts, evidence status for three claims, and one information question, with no career recommendation.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
138/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 138.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.
6. 過度寫作
Overwriting: overcomplicating a score
WEB-c190a95ff1e7 · 原文 / Source
頁面日期 / Page date: 2026-07-12（2026年7月12日） · 閱讀日期 / Accessed: 2026-10-22.
讀取網址 / Retrieved URL: https://www.wiwi.blog/blog/overwritten/
正文定位 / Body locator: 主要頁搜尋擷取：標題至結尾課程連結。
Primary-page search extraction: title through the closing course link.
完整正文；媒體未審。
Complete body; media unreviewed.
網頁工具未提供 HTTP 狀態。
The web tool did not report an HTTP status.
來源重點 / Source insight
作者區分演奏困難與作品品質，主張寫作難度應服務音樂目的，並容許改編網路樂譜。
The author separates performance difficulty from musical quality, arguing for purpose-led complexity and allowing adaptation of online scores.
來源用途與證據性質 / Source role and evidence type
訂明修改保留項。
Specify edit invariants.
個人觀點。
Personal viewpoint.
來源限制 / Source caveat
審美觀點，非品質測量；不把其大師例外當通則。
Aesthetic opinion, not quality measurement; its exception for masters is not adopted as a rule.
我們的原創任務（非來源練習） / Our original task (not a source exercise)
名稱 / Name
每組右手和弦少兩個音，不等於同一個聲音
Two fewer tones per right-hand chord do not mean the same sound
目標 / Objective
先訂保留條件，再分清結構符合、織度改變與尚未判斷的聽感。
Set preservation conditions first, then distinguish structural compliance, changed texture, and unassessed listening impressions.
狀態 / Status
原創教材草案；未實際演奏、錄音、操作軟體或進行使用者／成效測試。
Original teaching draft; no actual performance, recording, software operation, user testing, or outcome testing.
題目資料 / Task data
設定 / Setup
以下全為原創的一小節，4/4，C4＝中央 C。各列右手音高欄內的音同時起音、一起持續；無踏板。A 只需紙上分析，完全不必彈；可選試彈較少音的 B，速度與音量自選。
The following is a newly composed single bar in 4/4; C4 = middle C. The pitches in each right-hand row attack together and share the duration; no pedal. Analyze A on paper only; playing it is never required. Optionally play the less populated B at a comfortable pace and volume.
A 版 / Version A
左手 / Left hand
| 拍位 / Beat | 音高 / Pitches | 持續拍數 / Duration in beats |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | C3 | 4 |
右手 / Right hand
| 拍位 / Beat | 音高 / Pitches | 持續拍數 / Duration in beats |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | C4 · E4 · G4 | 2 |
| 3 | D4 · F4 · A4 | 2 |
B 版 / Version B
左手 / Left hand
| 拍位 / Beat | 音高 / Pitches | 持續拍數 / Duration in beats |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | C3 | 4 |
右手 / Right hand
| 拍位 / Beat | 音高 / Pitches | 持續拍數 / Duration in beats |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | G4 | 2 |
| 3 | A4 | 2 |
保留契約 / Preservation contract
只要求保留右手最高音的音高、起點及持續，並完整保留左手；不要求同樣和聲資訊、織度或音響效果。
Preserve only the pitches, onsets, and durations of the top right-hand line, plus the entire left-hand part; identical harmonic information, texture, or sonic effect is not required.
計數規則 / Counting rule
每個音高各算一次音符起音；同時按三個鍵算三次音符起音，但只有一個起音時點。
Count each pitch as one note attack; three simultaneous keys count as three note attacks but only one onset time.
步驟 / Steps
1.
遮住答案，列出 A/B 的最高音線、左手、每次右手同時音數與總音符起音數。
Cover the key and list the top line, left hand, simultaneous right-hand pitches per event, and total note attacks in A/B.
2.
逐項對照保留契約；另列四個刪除的音符事件，不把「符合契約」寫成「聲音一樣」。
Check every contract condition, then list the four deleted note events; do not replace “meets the contract” with “sounds identical.”
3.
可選只彈 B：先右手 G4 兩拍、A4 兩拍，再試左手 C3 四拍；若方便才合手。記錄做了哪一步，允許不合手。
Optionally play B only: first right-hand G4 for two beats and A4 for two beats, then left-hand C3 for four beats; combine only if comfortable. Record what was done; combining hands is optional.
核對答案 / Answer key
1.
兩版最高音線同為 G4 兩拍、A4 兩拍，左手同為 C3 四拍。A 右手每次三音，B 每次一音；A 全部七次音符起音，B 三次；起音時點皆只有第一、三拍。
Both top lines are G4 for two beats then A4 for two beats; both left hands hold C3 for four beats. A has three simultaneous right-hand pitches per event; B has one. Total note attacks are seven in A and three in B, with onset times only on beats 1 and 3 in both.
2.
刪除第一拍 C4、E4，以及第三拍 D4、F4，共四個事件。B 符合限定契約，但明確少了內部音高，不能稱完全相同的音樂內容或聲音。
The deletions are C4/E4 on beat 1 and D4/F4 on beat 3: four events. B meets the limited contract but omits inner pitches, so it is not identical musical content or sound.
3.
較少同時音是可直接數出的差異；是否更容易、較好聽或符合某種風格，沒有由這些數字證明。
Fewer simultaneous pitches is directly countable; greater ease, better sound, or stylistic fit is not established by those numbers.
決策界線 / Decision boundaries
若要求完整保留 A 的所有音，B 不合格；若只要求本題的最高音線與左手，B 合格。不要把這個答案外推到任何未讀過的作品。
If every note of A must be preserved, B fails; if only this task’s top line and left hand are required, B passes. Do not extend that answer to any unexamined work.
限制 / Limits
沒有試聽 A/B 或測試手部負擔；原創材料不是任何大師作品、網路譜或課程內容的改寫。
A/B were not auditioned and hand demands were not tested; the original material does not adapt any masterwork, online score, or course content.
完成檢查 / Completion check
交出四項保留核對、四個刪除事件與正確計數，並寫清楚契約合格不等於音響相同。
Submit checks of the preservation requirements, four deleted events, and correct counts, explicitly separating contractual compliance from sonic identity.
來源衍生預算 / Source-derived budget
159/200 單位 / units；先前審閱累計 / prior reviewed aggregate: 0；合計 / combined: 159.
計入雙語題名、兩種日期、涵蓋定位與說明、來源摘要、用途、證據類型和限制；無正文逐字引用，無跨節重述。原創任務另計；此 Markdown 與 JSON 是同一份審閱。
Counts bilingual titles, both date forms, coverage locators and notes, source summary, role, evidence type, and caveats. No verbatim body quotes or cross-section restatements. Original tasks are separate; this Markdown and JSON are one review.
紙上資料、音符、人物、條件、問題與答案均另行設計；不是來源文字或練習的改寫。
Paper data, notes, people, conditions, questions, and answers were newly designed, not adaptations of source text or exercises.